Rutgers University Student Instructional Rating
(Online Survey - Sakai)
Guo Zijian
zg124
Fall 2018, 16:958:588:01 — Data Mining (index #08936)
Enrollment= 22, Responses= 14

Part A: University-wide Questions:
Student Responses Weighted Means
Strong
Disagree
1
Strong
Agree
5
No response
 
Section Course Level Dept
1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner. 0 0 0 2 12 0 4.86 4.86 4.67 4.67
2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions. 0 0 1 4 9 0 4.57 4.57 4.65 4.66
3. The instructor generated interest in the course material. 0 0 0 6 8 0 4.57 4.57 4.56 4.59
4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material. 0 0 0 1 13 0 4.93 4.93 4.79 4.77
5. The instructor assigned grades fairly. 0 0 0 2 12 0 4.86 4.86 4.69 4.70
6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning. 0 0 0 2 12 0 4.86 4.86 4.61 4.63
7. I learned a great deal in this course. 0 0 0 4 10 0 4.71 4.71 4.60 4.63
8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course. 0 0 0 1 13 0 4.93 4.93 4.62 4.64
 PoorExcellent 
9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as: 0 0 0 4 10 0 4.71 4.71 4.62 4.66
10. I rate the overall quality of the course as: 0 0 0 5 9 0 4.64 4.64 4.63 4.67

What do you like best about this course?:

Great teacher, explained everything very clearly. Made learning the material fun and interesting

Breaking complex methods and making it easy to understand them.

Topics


If you were teaching this course, what would you do differently?:

spend less time on linear regression

Lab sessions for every class would elevate this a complete package.


In what ways, if any, has this course or the instructor encouraged your intellectual growth and progress?:

he makes the class interactive which is a great way to get students understand and learn


Other comments or suggestions::

I really enjoyed this great course and learned a lot from it. Thank you so much!